On Fri, 21 Feb 2014, Marcus Schopen wrote: > Hi, > > Am Freitag, den 21.02.2014, 17:23 +0100 schrieb Willy Offermans: > [...] >> >> >> I can answer my own question. I was indeed missing the authentication >> mechanism. I added <sasl_mech_list: PLAIN LOGIN> to imapd.conf on the >> back-end server and the replication worked. >> >> So I wonder how I can tell sync_client which authentication mechanism to >> use? It seems like a feature request to me? or a hidden option to the >> sync_client executable. > > That's an interesting question. I had a similar problem this week to > force master and slave to sync via TLS. As long as the banner on slave > side offered "DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 NTLM LOGIN PLAIN" to connection plain. > I set "allowplaintext: no" and "sasl_mech_list: PLAIN" on slave and now > both are talking PLAIN via TLS. So if there is an option on master side > to force to login using eg. CRAM-MD5 then there might be an option too > to force TLS. > >> I'm playing with replication now and testing what happens if one deletes >> e-mails on the back-end server and not on the client. Will these mails be >> restored on the back-end by replication and when? > > Don't understand, what is the client, the replica server? Have you looked at the sasl_minimum_layer option? sasl_minimum_layer: 0 The minimum SSF that the server will allow a client to negotiate. A value of 1 requires integrity protection; any higher value requires some amount of encryption. Andy ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/ To Unsubscribe: https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus