On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Marc Patermann <hans.moser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thomas,
Thomas Cataldo schrieb (11.03.2013 10:21 Uhr):Do you have a link?
"Note that some rights are available implicitly, for example 'anonymous' always has 'p' on user INBOXes, and users always have rights on mailboxes within their INBOX hierarchy."
I think this has always been this way.
I think Archive should qualify as "user B always has rights on mailboxes within the INBOX hierarchy, like the Archive folder".
When I look at the permissions with cyradm, I have :
localhost> lam user/b@xxxxxxxxxx
b@xxxxxxxxxx lrswipkxtecda
admin0 lrswipkxtecda
a@xxxxxxxxxx lrswipkxtecd
localhost> lam user/b/Archive@xxxxxxxxxx
admin0 lrswipkxtecda
a@xxxxxxxxxx lrswipkxtecda
Do I mis-understand something or should I file a bug ? (I am using unix hierarchy sep + altnamespace)
If you create a subfolder it inherits the rights from the upper level and so you have the same right for INBOX and subfolders, as long as you do not change the rights. You can always revoke your own rights, I think.
Moving/renaming a folder has always (as far I remember for 2.2. und 2.3) been keeping the rights with the folder.
Marc
The question is can we consider it a bug ? The same kind of problems happens when an IMAP client deletes a folder inside a shared folder. It renames the folder to move it to my trash and all the people that had read permissions on the shared folder start seeing Other users/me/Trash/The deleted folder in their imap clients.
Another related question would be, how do you guys deal with that ?
---- Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/ To Unsubscribe: https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus
