> On 06/22/2012 09:43 AM, Dave McMurtrie wrote: >> On 06/22/2012 06:35 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: >>> On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 13:07 -0300, Rodrigo Abantes Antunes wrote: >>>> The source from horde3 is exactly the same as horde4 >>> >>> That is expected. It isn't the message but the interpretation of the >>> message. These evil messages contain many named parts separated by a >>> boundry (the boundry value is declared in the header of the message). >>> Then parts of a message can refer to other parts of the message. So >>> either H4 can't correctly [or incorrectly!] parse the message into >>> parts >>> by boundry or one part references another part that isn't found. >>> >>> It would be useful to ask this question on the Horde / IMP mail list. >> >> I think this originated as a bug report to Horde and they think it's the >> IMAP server's fault. >> >> Rodrigo, can you forward the message to me? > > Hi. Rodrigo sent me the message. I wanted to confirm that the MIME > structure was correct so I used munpack which was able to successfully > unpack all the message parts. This isn't a guarantee that the MIME > structure is correct, but at the very least I can't definitely say the > message is malformed. > > I then imported the message into my mailstore. reconstruct was not > pleased with it from the start: > > Jun 22 15:29:48 cyrusbe-d04 reconstruct[28021]: ERROR: message has more > than 1000 header lines, not caching any more I did the same test on my box and reconstruct worked fine and I can view the message with Squirrelmail and Thunderbird without any problems. What's your version of cyrus-imapd you tested with? I have tested with a 2.4.16 server. Regards, Simon ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/ To Unsubscribe: https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus
