On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:19 -0700, "David Lang" <david.lang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I can easily see someone wanting to have INBOX.sub containing INBOX.sub.folder1 > and INBOX.sub.folder2 as an organizational mechanism > > if you were to create INBOX.sub and the user didn't want it, could they remove > it without affecting INBOX.sub.folder? No, not easily. It would delete the whole tree by default. > if you don't create INBOX.sub and the user wants it, will they run into any > grief when they try to create INBOX.sub due to the fact that the directory > already exists? No, that's not a problem. It will create just fine. Bron. -- Bron Gondwana brong@xxxxxxxxxxx ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
