On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 12:17:25PM +0200, Wolfgang Breyha wrote: > Hi! > > On 2011-04-02 11:59, Bron Gondwana wrote: > > Was there seriously a version of Cyrus that allows UID zero? That's > > bogus. Surely IMAP UIDs start at one. Hmm... so imapsync created them? I'll read the code for 2.3.7 and see how that's even possible. Ooh... just a guess - but did you have autocreate patches? I wonder if autocreate caused uidnext to be zero rather than one due to doing the append during the same lock as the create... > I found some historic info;-) I used cyrus-imap 2.3.7 back then. I used > "imapsync" to migrate mailboxes from courier to cyrus. It happend an > exactly one mailbox, but on several folders there. > > > If UID zero is allowed, I'll have to fix that code - and probably > > some other code which assumes UIDs are never zero... > > Ok, if that's the case I'll rename that files to the first available UID > and reconstruct the folder. Sounds reasonable. Actually, I think that's probably what reconstruct should do to the messages (well, NEXT available UID, so that the IMAP semantics stay correct) when it finds them... http://bugzilla.cyrusimap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3433 Bron. Bron. ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
