On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 09:24 -0500, Julien Vehent wrote: > On 12/14/2010 02:18 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 14:14 -0500, Julien Vehent wrote: > >> Hi list, > >> I was experimenting with shared mailboxes today. That's something new > >> I've never used before. > >> I wrote a wiki page of my setup on debian squeeze (still on cyrus 2.2) > >> and was wondering if that was the state of the art, or if there were any > >> better way to do it. > >> http://wiki.linuxwall.info/doku.php/en:ressources:dossiers:cyrus:shared_mailbox > >> Also, I didn't find any documentation on the subject on the website. Did > >> I miss something ? > > Nope, that's about it. They are very simple, and simple to use [once > > you manage to get *users* to understand them - which is the hard part]. > I have a problem with the shared mailbox and roundcube webmail. > While Thunderbird can access the shared mailbox just fine, roundcube > lists it (LSUB) but can't access it (It looks for > INBOX.shared.testshared instead of shared.testshared). > From the roundcube mailing list, that could be due to a wrong namespace > information returned from cyrus. > The namespace returned is the following: > --- > . namespace > * NAMESPACE (("INBOX." ".")) (("user." ".")) (("" ".")) > --- > Question is: shouldn't the 3rd argument be of the type "shared." ? > (Like in example 5.4 of the RFC [1]). I dunno about 5.4 but I believe the "postuser" [assuming that is where your "shared" thinking comes from] is only used to allow posting [via LMTP?] directly to a shared folder. I didn't/don't think it indicates the actual namespace of non-user folders. Perhaps this relates to a RoundCube bug <http://trac.roundcube.net/ticket/1403507>? RC's bad folder management is pretty well known. ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
