On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, Andrew Morgan might have said: > On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, Mike Eggleston wrote: > > >Afternoon, > > > >I'm still working on a sieve issue reported by a user. It seems the > >issue happens when the vacation rule is enabled. I have the users using > >SmartSieve rather than trying to teach them how to create rules using > >vi(1). > > > >I copied the user's sieve rule list (long, I'll not post here) and tried > >one of the messages and received a message I've not seen before from > >the smart sieve tester. > > > >The user insists on having lots of rules that file messages into multiple > >hundreds of folders. When the vacation rule is enabled the incoming > >messages are not filed. When the vacation rule isn't there (disabled), > >the incoming messages get filed as the user wants. > > It looks like the sieve rules are a giant if-elsif-else construct, and the > vacation rule is part of an elsif block. Shouldn't the vacation rule be > placed *outside* the if-elsif-else construct? > > Andy Andy, You're right about it being a giant if/else construct. I have told my users to put the vacation rule after the spam filtering rules so the user's are not responding to junk. Mike ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
