Brian Awood wrote: > On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:34:02 +0200, "Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)" > > <vanmeeuwen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: > >> My other point, of course, was that since the PostgreSQL guys worked to > >> fix a couple of bugs in cvs2git over the past couple of weeks, you may > >> get a better result if you grab the tip version of cvs2git and re-run > >> the conversion. > > > > If we were using cvs2git, sure! But we're not using cvs2git, we're using > > git-cvsimport ;-) > > I would highly recommend cvs2git over git-cvsimport for reproducing an > accurate history of the cvs repository. cvs2git doesn't do incremental > imports like cvsimport, but I don't think that is needed in this situation. > You may want to give it a try, just for a comparison anyway. > I'm not sure what I am to understand from this. I've done thousands of conversions both with cvs2git as well as git-cvsimport. If you think there is a problem with git-cvsimport I may be unaware of, or there is a solution cvs2git has implemented that may or may not have been an actual problem with git-cvsimport, please point those out. Kind regards, -- Jeroen van Meeuwen Senior Engineer, Kolab Systems AG e: vanmeeuwen@xxxxxxxxxxxx t: +316 42 801 403 w: http://www.kolabsys.com pgp: 9342 BF08 ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
