On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Bron Gondwana wrote: > On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 11:14:02AM +0200, Rudy Gevaert wrote: > > On 05/31/2010 03:31 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote: > > > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:58:57PM +0200, Rudy Gevaert wrote: > > >>> Renaming forth and back is a way, but not a really good solution to this > > >>> problem. > > >> > > >> Hi Mark, > > >> > > >> Have you been able to fix this? It seems a bug to me. > > > > > > Sorry, yes - it's a bug. It will be fixed in 2.4 (as in, I've already > > > come across it while rewriting the sync protocol and fixed it) - I'm not > > > sure there's heaps of value backporting it to 2.3 right now. > > > > > > Another workaround is just to rename the folder on the replica as well. > > > Presumably the admin is doing this, and it's a fairly rare case... > > > > > > Bron ( yes, workaround suck... ) > > > > > > Thanks for replying. > > > > How are other people doing this who are using partitions and replication? > > (we don't use partitions) > > Is it common to rename mailboxes across partitions once they're created? Well, I'm planning to move mailboxes to other spools for balancing the disk usage after adding new spools. Does this bug affect XFER as well? -Jukka Huhta, Univ. of Helsinki ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/ Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
