Re: Any interest to implement RFC4978 (IMAP COMPRESS)?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:30:09AM +0000, Dennis Davis wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, steffo76@xxxxxx wrote:
> 
> > From: steffo76@xxxxxx
> > To: info-cyrus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:03:31
> > Subject: Re: Any interest to implement RFC4978 (IMAP COMPRESS)?
> > X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
> > 
> > >From the 2.3.15 Changelog:
> > 
> > * Added support for MUPDATE COMPRESS and IMAP COMPRESS commands which
> >   help speed up bulk data commands over slow links.
> > 
> > It actually already _is_ implemented.
> 
> And Bron Gondwana has posted a patch to offlineimap to
> take advantage of this.  See:
> 
> http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/2009-October/031902.html

Hehe - yeah.  I still run it myself every day.  Works fine.  I should
make some more effort to get the necessary patches integrated upstream.

Bron.
----
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html

[Index of Archives]     [Cyrus SASL]     [Squirrel Mail]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [KDE]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux