Re: Backup strategy for large mailbox stores

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Out of curiousity, how good is zfs with full fs scans when running in  
the 100-million file count range?  What do you see in terms of  
aggregate MB/s throughput?





-- 
John madden
Sr UNIX Systems Engineer
Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana
jmadden@xxxxxxxxxxx


On Feb 15, 2010, at 15:43, "Vincent Fox" <vbfox@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> John Madden wrote:
>>
>> We did quite a bit with snapshots (LVM) to when we were experimenting
>> with block-level backups but there's a performance problem there --  
>> we
>> were saturating GbE.  Snapshot doesn't really buy you anything in
>> terms of getting the data to tape.
>>
>>
> We run the tape backup from previous night snapshot, that way we  
> know it's a
> read-only copy and nothing in flight.  All of our usage so far has  
> been
> "I deleted
> all my mail 2 days ago" and we retrieve that from snapshots.  For our
> day-to-day
> purposes nobody interacts with the tape except we know it's there  
> for DR.
>
>
>
----
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html

[Index of Archives]     [Cyrus SASL]     [Squirrel Mail]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [KDE]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux