On 11/18/2009 01:15 PM, Johannes Rußek wrote: > Hi Brian, > thanks for the recommendation, but you have to note that this is RHEL > cyrus, which means there are a lot of backports in it.. Usually security fixes though. > As usual, RH version is not the same as upstream version. Also with RH > you are pretty much bound to what you get :) You could try this source RPM: http://www.invoca.ch/pub/packages/cyrus-imapd/cyrus-imapd-2.3.15-4.src.rpm > I'll get both machines to RHEL's 2.3.9 first, then try replication > again. > Thanks everybody, > Johannes > > Am Mittwoch, den 18.11.2009, 10:43 -0500 schrieb Brian Awood: >> On Tuesday 17 November 2009 @ 13:11, Patrick Boutilier wrote: >>> On 11/17/2009 01:34 PM, Johannes Rußek wrote: >>>> Nope, i'm not. is this necessary? >>>> it's 2.3.9 on the master and 2.3.7 on the replica. >>>> if that's the problem i will take care of that first. >>> >>> They are both 2.3.x so that shouldn't be a problem. However those >>> versions are relatively old. 2.3.15 is the latest in the 2.3 >>> series. >>> >>> I just setup replication a couple of weeks ago and haven't seen any >>> of those errors. >> >> I believe there were major changes in the sync protocol between 2.3.7 >> & 2.3.9, enough to probably make them incompatible. Although, I >> would also recommend running 2.3.15 over anything older. >> >> -Brian >> ---- >> Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/ >> Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki >> List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/ Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
