Hi Bron, thanks for looking into the annotation/metadata stuff. > So I'm thinking: create a new metadata.db, require a conversion on upgrade > from annotations.db. I had a look, and none of our servers had ANY > annotations until I added a /comment to my INBOX for testing. Just to be sure: do you plan to change the current annotatemore-code so that it will access the new database and an old client still using annotatemore will still work? > Does anybody out there use annotations much? Does anybody know any code > that would be broken by changing the way annotations are done? Given that there is code to convert the old annotations.db to metadata.db I don't see any problems for us. Our backup code will probably need some tweaking, but when the new db format is more sane than the current mess I don't see any problems with that. Kind regards, Gerd -- Address (better: trap) for people I really don't want to get mail from: jonas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/ Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
