On 07/16/2009 09:55 AM, Brian Awood wrote:
> On Thursday 16 July 2009 @ 05:21, Gavin Gray wrote:
>
> replication is significantly slower than xfer, but it shouldn't affect
> the speed of xfer. We wrote some scripts to prevent xfer from
> getting too far ahead of replication. Since our replicas are a key
> part of our DR/backup strategy, we never would want to get in a
> situation where a large amount of data wasn't replicated. In your
> situation it shouldn't matter since the data is not replicated
> currently, you should just be able to enable rolling replication and
> let it catch up. If you still would like to keep xfer from getting
> too far ahead of replication, I can probably post the scripts we use
> for this.
>
> -Brian
>
Brian,
I certainly would be interested in seeing those. Please post them here,
or to the Wiki.
Best regards,
-nic
--
Nic Bernstein nic@xxxxxxxxxxx
Onlight llc. www.onlight.com
219 N. Milwaukee St., Suite 2a v. 414.272.4477
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202
----
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
