Re: mupdate TLS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 14 May 2009, Duncan Gibb wrote:

> Andrew Morgan wrote:
>
> AM> Does the mupdate process in a Cyrus murder actually use TLS?
>
> AM> And....  after a lot of digging I see that this is a known bug:
>
> AM>    https://bugzilla.andrew.cmu.edu/show_bug.cgi?id=3119
>
> AM> Never mind!  This sounds like an very complicated problem
>
> Not particularly - it's quite a small patch which goes onto 2.3.14 and
> current CVS HEAD cleanly.  If there's any extra work required for it to
> be applied upstream, I'm happy to do that.

Well I'm a little scared to break things on my production cyrus site.  I 
don't particularly need this feature, but it was on my checklist of things 
for a long time.  I'm happy to wait until this code is included in a 
regular release.

> AM> so I'll just stay away from TLS for mupdate.  Although I don't
> AM> understand why mupdate isn't having problems for me right now,
> AM> since mupdate seems to be advertising STARTTLS in the
> AM> capability string.
>
> If your config allows the Mupdate server to advertise a usable SASL mech
> without doing a "STARTTLS", then backend_authenticate() won't bother.

Ah, that explains it.  I have allowplaintext: 1 at the moment.  I'll make 
a note of this though.

Thanks for your explanation!

 	Andy
----
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html

[Index of Archives]     [Cyrus SASL]     [Squirrel Mail]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [KDE]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux