----- Original Message ----- From: "Alain Spineux" <aspineux@xxxxxxxxx> To: <spamtest-eir1beucei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: <info-cyrus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 2:03 AM Subject: Re: plus addressing over lmtp not working / sam [box] anyone p set >I made multiple comments , look carefully > > On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Stefan Pampel > <spamtest-eir1beucei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Alain Spineux <aspineux@xxxxxxxxx> schrieb: >>> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Stefan Pampel >>><spamtest-eir1beucei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> it seems that plus addressing not work in my case: >>>> >>>> postfix configured correctly: >>>> main.cf: >>>> recipient_delimiter = + >>>> >>>> master.cf: >>>> lmtp unix - - n - - lmtp >>>> >>>> Mails basically reach the INBOX, but not the folder itself >>>> >>>> cyrus config: >>>> <snip> >>>> altnamespace: yes # even with no does not work >>>> virtdomains: userid >>>> defaultdomain: foo.bar.org >>>> unixhierarchysep: no >>>> </snip> >>>> >>>> The folder >>>> lam user.user1.spam >>>> >>>> user1 lrswipcda >>>> anyone p >>>> >>>> The mail header contains >>>> To: user1 <user1+spam@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> Any hints? >>> >>> Does the email goes in the user INBOX at least ? >> >> Yes, it goes to the INBOX, the header of the recieived mail looks like >> this >> >> <snip> >> >> Return-Path: <foobar@xxxxxxxxx> >> Received: from foo.org ([unix socket]) >> by foo.org (Cyrus v2.2.13-Debian-2.2.13-14+b3) with LMTPA; >> Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:44:21 +0100 >> X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2 >> Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) >> by foo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B24EF4D11 >> for <user@xxxxxxx>; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:44:21 +0100 (CET) >> X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at >> X-Spam-Flag: NO >> X-Spam-Score: -0.001 >> X-Spam-Level: >> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 >> tests=[SPF_PASS=-0.001] >> Received: from foo.org ([127.0.0.1]) >> by localhost (foo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) >> with LMTP id ggSVa5nIr8Oq for <user@xxxxxxx>; > > The problem is just here, above > >> Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:44:20 +0100 (CET) >> Received: from mail-qy0-f21.google.com (mail-qy0-f21.google.com >> [209.85.221.21]) >> by foo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53DEDE01D5A >> for <user+spam@xxxxxxx>; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:44:20 +0100 (CET) > > Because it was still "user+spam" here ! > >> Received: by qyk14 with SMTP id 14so3861085qyk.11 >> for <user+spam@xxxxxxx>; Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:44:19 -0800 (PST) >> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; >> d=gmail.com; s=gamma; >> h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to >> :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding >> :content-disposition; >> bh=OsY01wpTsRs9wg12b8CJsXpNhhRKn9VYCZ0l9cxhl5Q=; >> >> b=h9NS27DnBzXhMGBpPICUp2U5tEwgbn+ouAhGLuYteBJnMWw5hIQ4vj+d8bNn8TzV4E >> >> DNtPqxGU0QXa55JsPSjYZU4yZyCk5kA1oCNacatnsWRY2LvrVtdUS7spqAYZWNpxsXas >> z78A3NBawCutspEj0pOlUbfwNLDDrnjK20Ce8= >> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; >> d=gmail.com; s=gamma; >> h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type >> :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; >> >> b=dvgd4c6c5TbTVmP0TibQyKDSpojbNRDZTIbmWt5DV9TMvTfdHmBtxL+564/pci7phD >> >> 4knxRl2MUb483WxZJcKazltQuT5+WtoxN0Ljg2xtqGEc+EijyG9NMCno/CtQSIA82Mg+ >> FWG33nCiGc/cAxhGSQo+oe0LMtap+BZVHYNIM= >> Received: by 10.214.183.9 with SMTP id g9mr12118283qaf.35.1228247059060; >> Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:44:19 -0800 (PST) >> Received: by 10.214.182.8 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:44:19 -0800 (PST) >> Message-ID: <fe5446ec0812021144o6d3270b7x372ae0cdbc7cec5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:44:19 +0100 >> From: "Stefan Pampel" <foobar@xxxxxxxxx> >> To: user <user+spam@xxxxxxx> >> Subject: 123 >> >> </snip> >> >>> Did you look into the lmtpd.log and postfix.log to check if the >>> delivery looks ok .? >> >> too me it looks ok. >> >> <snip> >> Dec 2 20:44:19 asp4 postfix/smtpd[6073]: connect from >> mail-qy0-f21.google.com[209.85.221.21] >> Dec 2 20:44:20 asp4 postfix/smtpd[6073]: 53DEDE01D5A: >> client=mail-qy0-f21.google.com[209.85.221.21] >> Dec 2 20:44:20 asp4 postfix/cleanup[6076]: 53DEDE01D5A: >> message-id=<fe5446ec0812021144o6d3270b7x372ae0cdbc7cec5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Dec 2 20:44:20 asp4 postfix/qmgr[2392]: 53DEDE01D5A: >> from=<foobar@xxxxxxxxx>, size=2214, nrcpt=1 (queue active) >> Dec 2 20:44:21 asp4 postfix/smtpd[6081]: connect from unknown[127.0.0.1] >> Dec 2 20:44:21 asp4 postfix/smtpd[6081]: D0B24EF4D11: >> client=unknown[127.0.0.1] >> Dec 2 20:44:21 asp4 postfix/cleanup[6076]: D0B24EF4D11: >> message-id=<fe5446ec0812021144o6d3270b7x372ae0cdbc7cec5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Dec 2 20:44:21 asp4 postfix/smtpd[6081]: disconnect from >> unknown[127.0.0.1] >> Dec 2 20:44:21 asp4 postfix/qmgr[2392]: D0B24EF4D11: >> from=<foobar@xxxxxxxxx>, size=2816, nrcpt=1 (queue active) >> Dec 2 20:44:21 asp4 cyrus/lmtpunix[6070]: accepted connection >> Dec 2 20:44:21 asp4 cyrus/lmtpunix[6070]: lmtp connection preauth'd as >> postman >> Dec 2 20:44:21 asp4 cyrus/master[6083]: about to exec >> /usr/lib/cyrus/bin/lmtpd >> Dec 2 20:44:21 asp4 cyrus/lmtpunix[6083]: executed >> Dec 2 20:44:21 asp4 amavis[17280]: (17280-18) Passed CLEAN, >> [209.85.221.21] [209.85.221.21] <foobar@xxxxxxxxx> -> <user@xxxxxxx>, >> Message-ID: <fe5446ec0812021144o6d3270b7x372ae0cdbc7cec5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, >> mail_id: ggSVa5nIr8Oq, Hits: -0.001, size: 2214, queued_as: D0B24EF4D11, >> 1298 m >> s >> Dec 2 20:44:21 asp4 postfix/lmtp[6077]: 53DEDE01D5A: to=<user@xxxxxxx>, >> orig_to=<user+spam@xxxxxxx>, relay=127.0.0.1 >> [127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=1.7, delays=0.39/0/0/1.3, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent >> (250 2.0.0 Ok, id=17280-18, from MTA([127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: >> queued a > > HERE is the "culprit" ! postfix tell us, it got "user+spam" and give > back "user" to [127.0.0.1]:10024 ! > > Does it mean amavis and postfix use LMTP protocol ? This is unusual ! > (but this is not the probleme) > >> s D0B24EF4D11) >> Dec 2 20:44:21 asp4 postfix/qmgr[2392]: 53DEDE01D5A: removed >> >> </snip> >> >> best regards >> >> Stefan Pampel >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) >> >> iEYEARECAAYFAkk1k6AACgkQXXT1nfS2Z+GcFwCgr0iakn99Six0GbcxHnwYeVBQ >> 4OYAnidQaOIP+PPfxxtV7/jmiDnYunrd >> =jp7p >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >> -- >> / polyformal / >> | http://www.polyformal.de / >> |_________________________/ >> GPG KEY: 11678845 >> amavisd-new by default does not have plus addressing enabled. Add or uncomment this line to amavisd.conf and reload it: $recipient_delimiter = '+'; LT ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/ Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
