Re: Which 2.3.x version to match 2.2.12 in stability? :-)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



--On 16. September 2008 14:17:57 +0200 Ciprian Marius Vizitiu <cvizitiu@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

As much as I hate it time has come to upgrade my very well behaved Cyrus
imapd so I was wondering: given the rock solid stability I have
experienced with 2.2.12 is there any 2.3.x Cyrus with some close record
of stability?

Sure! 2.3.x is at least as stable as 2.2.x, I'd say even more so. We're currently running 2.3.11, but I'd use the latest version. We're planning on upgrading soon.
--
    .:.Sebastian Hagedorn - RZKR-R1 (Gebäude 52), Zimmer 18.:.
Zentrum für angewandte Informatik - Universitätsweiter Service RRZK
.:.Universität zu Köln / Cologne University - ✆ +49-221-478-5587.:.
                  .:.:.:.Skype: shagedorn.:.:.:.

Attachment: pgp5ntwkHiA4R.pgp
Description: PGP signature

----
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html

[Index of Archives]     [Cyrus SASL]     [Squirrel Mail]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [KDE]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux