> Given that he's got two machines, I might suggest mupdate_config: > replicated and definitely have mailboxes.db on local disk. I'm taking a look at the configuration of the mupdate replicated architecture. As stated in an old post on this list (20-Dec-2005), the Cyrus 2.3 replicated configuration seams a very good solution, but in the current documentation is stated :"Note that load balancing is not possible with the current replication code, but it is intended to be supported in the future." I would like to use both server in active/active configuration, is it possible with the mupdate replication? Otherwise I will study the solution proposed by Bron to sync a local mailbox.db with the GFS...but I have to pay attention on the contemporary of the sync from the two servers. Regards Maurizio ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/ Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
