Going to toss in my 10 cents. I'm assuming the GFS is the same lun/id on both servers, and you are using GFS to read-write between 2 or more servers. You could try OCFS2 instead of GFS... Other then that the only thing I can think of is using DRBD in a read-write configuration. However that would be using 2 lun/id's instead of only 1. However I imagine the results will be more or less the same, as GFS2 and OCFS2 may handle reads and writes to ensure accuracy? On May 14, 2008, at 7:46 AM, Wesley Craig wrote: > Given that he's got two machines, I might suggest mupdate_config: > replicated and definitely have mailboxes.db on local disk. > > :wes > > On 14 May 2008, at 06:30, Bron Gondwana wrote: >> Depending on your requirements, it may make sense to place your >> mailboxes.db on local >> disk (it's pretty small) and regularly copy/rsync it onto your GFS >> partition. Worst >> case you lose a couple of mailboxes.db records in a crash. Depends >> what you can afford >> to lose. You could probably stat the file every second and copy it >> on any change pretty >> cheaply and risk losing at most the last second's changes (it >> doesn't change often) > > ---- > Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/ > Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki > List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html > > > !DSPAM:482b00dc195276105139502! > > ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/ Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
