Re: TMPFS for socket and log directories?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Nov 29, 2007, at 21:34, Vincent Fox wrote:

> We had sym-linked imap/proc directory to a size-limited
> TMPFS a while back.
>
> Now I'm thinking to do the same for imap/socket and imap/log
>
> Any reasons against?  Other candidates?

You're probably not going to see wins on the socket data, since that  
directory is probably very well cached and doesn't get any/many  
writes.  imap/log will only give you a win if you're doing any  
debugging logging for someone, which I hope you're not doing very  
often as it is.

I think that proc is probably the biggest win, since it's quite write- 
happy.

-rob
----
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html

[Index of Archives]     [Cyrus SASL]     [Squirrel Mail]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [KDE]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux