On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 08:57:29AM +0100, Rudy Gevaert wrote: > Bron Gondwana wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 07:19:26PM -0800, Rich Wales wrote: >>> What is the current status of 2.3.10? Right after it was announced >>> a couple of weeks ago, I saw some people reporting problems. Are >>> there any patches? Or is 2.3.10 still believed to be OK as is? >>> >>> I'm running 2.3.9 on a FreeBSD 6.2 master and an Ubuntu 7.10 replica >>> server setup, and I want to upgrade to 2.3.10 in hopes of getting >>> rid of some problems with the sync code intermittently crashing, but >>> this is a production system, and I don't feel comfortable upgrading >>> to 2.3.10 as long as there are unresolved serious bug reports. >> FastMail is running 2.3.10 on all our production systems now, and >> there are no regressions that I'm aware of. There are still some >> bugs that also existed in 2.3.9, but we aren't patching against >> any "bugs" rather than "things that don't work how we would prefer". > > I have upgraded three (of seven) mailstores yesterday. Upgrade went > without problems. Regeneration of the guid takes a long time. It's not > finished yet, and its been running for 12 hours. That's why I pre-calculated all the sha1s I could and wrote my own index upgrader :) Yeah, it takes a while! Bron. ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/ Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
