Re: Replication to more than one replica?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



With such a small number of users, you might be all set.  Keep in  
mind that -u only gets users, not shared mailboxes not associated  
with any user.  In UMich's system, we just run tape backups on the  
replica, no need for a second replica.  I've done cost comparisons  
between having two replicas or having the first replica write to tape  
(answer: depends).

:wes

On 10 Aug 2007, at 10:52, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
> It would be a way to keep a second offline replica for backing up to a
> tape archive, which is what I plan to do. I realize it's slower  
> than the
> standard rolling replication but the archive is mainly for "ooops I
> deleted that mail" kind of scenario. In fact, I'm testing the setup
> right know with a list of all users. First run will take a while but
> further ones should only take a couple of minutes.
>
> Of course this setup is a workaround and it gets increasingly more
> difficult with the number of users, here we only have around 500
> although many mailboxes are quite large.
----
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html

[Index of Archives]     [Cyrus SASL]     [Squirrel Mail]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [KDE]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux