Toschi Pietro wrote: > > > > localhost.localdomain> cm group/office1@xxxxxxxxxxx > > that resulted OK, and mailbox is listed with lm. > > > > localhost.localdomain> lam group/office1@xxxxxxxxxxx returns: > > anyone lrs (isn't it strange? I didn't issue any sam command on that > > mailbox) > > > > Now I'm wandering what I really did? > > > You've created a bulletin board. This is basically a mailbox that isn't associated with an email address. The lrs permissions are default for any mailbox outside the user hierarchy > > > > - I can't post any message to office1@xxxxxxxxxxx: it results in an > > error from my MTA (postfix) saying: "<office@xxxxxxxxxxx>: host > > XX.XX.XX.XX[YY.YY.YY.YY] said: 550-Mailbox unknown. Either there is no > > mailbox associated with this 550-name or you do not have authorization > > to see it. 550 5.1.1 User unknown (in reply to RCPT TO command)" > > > It's not counted as a default user so it won't be recognized by cyrus as that email address. IIRC you need to sent to +office@xxxxxxxxxxx, for more about this look at bulletin boards http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/archive/message.php?mailbox=archive.info-cyrus&msg=42994 > > > > > > - I can't access mailbox for reading emails. I mean: having LDAP > > authentication and a corresponding LDAP entry for office1@xxxxxxxxxxx > > I can correctly authenticate but upon selecting INBOX cyrus complains: > > CLIENT: "3 select \"INBOX\"\r\n" > > REAL: "3 NO Mailbox does not exist\r\n" > > (client-server transaction logs come from perdition) > > > This is because you client is looking under user/office1 not group/office1 the only way to access it is to use it like a shared mailbox (because thats what it is) > > > > - any user in domain "domain1.com" is able to subscribe to "office1" > > folder visible under "group", according with lrs ACL > > > > - I changed to "write" the ACL of office1 for "anynone" and I verified > > that any user in @domain1.com is able to copy messages to that shared > > folder. > > > > > > Now, I am a little confused about what a "group" is compared to a > > traditional "user"? > > Can someone give some explanation please? > > > It doesn't have to be group it could be sdjfh for all cyrus would care. The only special hierarchy is the user hierarchy the others can be created however you want. I hope thats been of some help. Regards, Jack Stone ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/ Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
