Re: NFSv4, anyone?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/1/06, Rudy Gevaert <Rudy.Gevaert@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Adam Kramer wrote:
> Just another datapoint,
>
> Cyrus seems to work fine with a 2.4 kernel via NFSv3 to a netapp filer
> when mounted with -o nolock. It doesn't use lockd, but it still uses
> local locking. imaptest has no problems (except for "STORE failed: NO
> Too many user flags in mailbox" which is just because cyrus has a
> limit on how many different flags can exist in a mailbox.) I undefined
> RAND_KEYWORDS and recompiled imaptest and it didn't report any errors
> in about 20 minutes of running.
>
> Obviously with '-o nolock' you won't be able to have two servers
> accessing the same mail store, but it could be used for quick failover
> from one machine to another while still having the benefits of a
> netapp like snapmirroring and .snapshot directories.

How do you get consistant snapshots?  Without stopping cyrus... Or don't
you care about that?

As far as I'm aware, Netapp snapshots are atomic across a volume.
Thus, a snapshot should be no different than the state the system
could be left in should it crash or lose power. If a non-filesystem
damaging crash can leave Cyrus in an unrecoverable state, we all have
some other problems to think about. :)

--
-Adam
----
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html

[Index of Archives]     [Cyrus SASL]     [Squirrel Mail]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [KDE]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux