> --On Wednesday, August 09, 2006 7:10 PM +0200 Daniel Eckl <deckl@xxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> https://bugzilla.andrew.cmu.edu/show_bug.cgi?id=1212 >> https://bugzilla.andrew.cmu.edu/show_bug.cgi?id=2690 > > Thanks! > > --On Wednesday, August 09, 2006 8:36 PM +0200 Simon Matter > <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> With 2.2 it was 2GB, with 2.3 it may be 2TB or something, just usually >> large enough. > > Great! > >> 64-bit quota has been made in 2.3 and backported to 2.2. They work the >> same way. I don't know what your problem is but maybe you have to update >> quota with "quota -f" after switching your mailspool to the 64bit quota >> thing. > > Heh... Did I say what my problem is? :) No problem... no problem... I > just > wanted to know the definitive answer, which you guys gave me! > >>> Does the large quota patch require a 64-bit machine/os in order to >>> permit quotas larger than 2GB? >> >> No, it works fine on 32bit cpu/os. > > Thank you both for your quick answers. FYI, we are running on a version > older than 2.2.12. However, we will be likely upgrading to Linux and the > latest version of Cyrus maybe in December. It is unlikely we will patch > our software right now to accomodate quotas larger than 2GB, but maybe it > won't be up to me on that... Only 1 user is requesting a larger quota than > that right now. Okay, just to make it clear again, 2.2.12 does not include the 64bit quota patches but I included the patches in my 2.2.12 rpms. Simon ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
