At Sun, 23 Jul 2006 23:37:41 +0100, Mark Hellman wrote: > > Do you think a RAID array like this one: > http://www.infortrend.com/main/2_product/a08u-c2412.asp > would be adequate for storing Cyrus mailboxes? Using a SCSI host interface isn't going to be nearly so flexible as using a Fibre Channel one, especially in the longer run (e.g. if you ever want to add more storage, more storage controllers, share them amongst multiple hosts, add backup devices and also share them between hosts, etc., etc., etc.). It might be possible to make it a tiny bit cheaper in the short run -- however cheap FC host adapters are probably just as fast and usable as cheap U320 adapters, but good and powerful U320 adapters are likely as expensive as good and powerful FC adapters. U320 seems more finnicky than FC to me too. That particular storage array looks adequate -- at least for some unspecified combination of Cyrus users and storage capacity. :-) -- Greg A. Woods H:+1 416 218-0098 W:+1 416 489-5852 x122 VE3TCP RoboHack <woods@xxxxxxxxxxx> Planix, Inc. <woods@xxxxxxxxxx> Secrets of the Weird <woods@xxxxxxxxx> ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
