Hi Derrell,
Thank You for the review! Please see inline.
> pp. 3, 1., nit
>
> "...enables the single-sign-on features, which allows the user to..."
>
> "...enables single sign-on, which allows the user to..."
We can fix as suggested.
---
> pp. 5, last sentence
>
> "previously" means "from the out-of-scope mechanism", just say that.
I think that sounds a little "clumsy" to repeat it. Would it work if we said "obtained in the step above", or something like that?
---
> pp. 7, 2.1.1
>
> "(or with invalid credentials)"
>
> Why continue when a UAC presents invalid credentials? [See below.]
>
>
> pp. 8, 2.1.3
>
> 2.1.1 says if you get invalid credentials to go REGISTER, and here in
> REGISTER, it says if you get invalid credentials, go to 2.1.1. This
> seems recursive though I'm assuming this ultimately terminates when all
> the schemes are exhausted without success.
Section 2.1.1 defines generic procedures, while section 2.1.3 defines the procedures specific for the REGISTER request.
Regards,
Christer
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
