On 14/4/20 09:16, Martin Vigoureux wrote:
WG,
it's been more than a month since the e-mail below.
In the meantime there were few updates. These updates cover the
resolution of Brian's (v11 and finally v12) and Joel's (v13 and finally
v15) concerns, plus some other minor changes.
So, procedurally speaking, how come that:
1) *Firstly* you declare consensus
2) Then multiple folks claim that their concerns have been ignored,
3) Once month later, and after successive revisions from the one you
declared consensus on, you ship the document to the IESG for
publication?
During the last month, I asked multiple times what was the status of
this documents. My questions were ignored.
Was the plan to try to address concerns *after* you had already declared
wg consensus?
And, in that light, didn't you get the process backwards? (i.e., first
you listen to the community, then concerns are addressed, and *then* you
declare wg consensus?)
Thanks,
--
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
