Re: [Last-Call] [Anima] Why a 2nd Last Call ? Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-24.txt> (An Autonomic Control Plane (ACP)) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric Vyncke \(evyncke\) <evyncke=40cisco.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    > The previous IETF Last Call on this document was in February 2018 for
    > revision -13. Since then, the authors have made substantive changes in
    > the document and we are now at revision -24. The authors and myself
    > believe that the document is ready for IESG evaluation but I, as the
    > shepherding AD, consider that the amount of changes requires a new IETF
    > Last Call.

I have read the latest document, and I am happy with the result.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux