On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 3:20 PM Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Barry Leiba <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> THIS NOMCOM CYCLE ONLY and SETTING NO PRECEDENT, I would replace the
> first two paragraphs this way:
.....
> The question I will ask is this: Is there anyone who *can't live with
> that outcome*?
I can live with this.
{I think that the impact is very small, and might even be zero.
I intend to try to determine the numbers exactly.
Having the Bluesheets entered from last week would help some scenarios.}
I agree. Why not include IETF 107?
Regards,
Behcet
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
