Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:15 PM Michael StJohns <mstjohns@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 3/31/2020 1:56 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote:


At this point I really don't care all that much because it's probably
not going to materially affect the outcome of the Nomcom process -
mainly because it was unexpected enough that no one was in a position to
game this easily.   Selecting one of these 4 different options at random
may be the best strategy - everyone will be equally annoyed, but it
might be possible to get consensus.

I would agree to that point.  I think a decision just needs to be made and we as the community will need to accept it and move on.  We need a Nomcom seated, and get on with business.

No matter what we do, it's not going to be perfect or even ideal, so debating this much further likely is not going to make the outcome any better (as it assumes there is a "best" position).

regards,

Victor K


 

Later, Mike




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux