Hi Barry,
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 11:26 PM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The IESG has discussed what the best way is to handle a decision for eligibility for the 2020/21 NomCom, given the timeframe involved and the discussions that are already happening.1. We are concerned that a normal process for discussing a draft, conducting a last call, and approving a BCP would take too long.2. We are concerned that rushing such a process by, for example, posting a draft now and immediately last-calling it without a normal period of discussion would call into question the legitimacy of our consensus process and would set a bad precedent. We also note that have already stated that we’d like community comments by 30 April, and we are concerned about cutting that time short in order to write such a draft.4. We believe the IESG does have — and must have — the latitude to address exceptional situations such as this and to make exceptions to our processes. At the same time, we appreciate and agree with concerns about overstepping, and we agree that maintaining accountability and appropriate checks and balances is important.The IESG, therefore, plans to continue collecting input and evaluating the community’s rough consensus about the immediate NomCom-eligibility question through 30 April, as stated. We will then post a statement and inform the ISOC Board of Trustees, as we would do with a process BCP. That statement will serve as the basis for eligibility to serve on this year’s NomCom, and this year’s only; it will NOT remain in effect beyond that brief timeframe, and will make that aspect clear.If rough consensus of the community is that it is important for the IESG’s decision to be published as a BCP, we will do so, handling that after the immediate need for a quick decision has passed and making the publication for archival purposes.We also encourage the community to continue and complete the two efforts that have been started, to formally define an exception process, and to update NomCom eligibility requirements to account for virtual meetings and for remote participation.Barry, for the IESG
What happened to Number 3?
Regards,
Behcet
