Hi all,
To close the loop on this IETF LC:
Based on feedback received during IETF LC and after consulting with
Transport ADs:
1) It is quite clear that the document needs to be revised to reflect
IETF LC feedback (including feedback received from Port Exports). I will
be passing this document to Martin Duke as the responsible AD, who will
decide when the document is ready and whether it needs another IETF LC.
2) IESG and IANA will create a list of RFC references that should be
added to registered system ports. No action will be taken without
consulting with the IETF community.
3) IESG might also ask IANA to contact existing change controllers for
existing system port registrations in order to see if current contact
details are accurate.
Best Regards,
Alexey
On 10/02/2020 15:44, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the
following document: - 'Reassignment of System Ports to the IESG'
<draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-04.txt> as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
last-call@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2020-03-09. Exceptionally, comments may
be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning
of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
Abstract
In the IANA Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry,
a large number of System Ports is currently assigned to individuals
or companies who have registered the port for the use with a certain
protocol before RFC6335 was published. For some of these ports, RFCs
exist that describe the respective protocol; for others, RFCs are
under development that define, re-define, or assign the protocol used
for the respective port, e.g. in case of so-far unused UDP ports that
have been registered together with the respective TCP port. In these
cases the IESG has the change control about the protocol used on the
port (as described in an RFC) but does not have the change control
about the port usage itself. Currently, to transfer the change
control to the IESG, the original assignee has to be contacted to
initialize this transfer. As it is not always possible to get in
touch with the original assignee, e.g. because of out-dated contact
information or other reasons, and the current practice of case-by-
case changes does not scale well, this document instructs IANA to
perform actions with the goal to reassigns all System Ports to the
IESG that have been assigned to individuals prior to the publication
of RFC6335.
The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kuehlewind-system-ports/
IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kuehlewind-system-ports/ballot/
No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
