On 17 Feb 2020, at 16:38, Erik Kline via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Are any of the recommendations for client resolvers in this document > covered the IPR (https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3077/) claimed for: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8305#section-7 > > (which has some similar/related recommendations, especially 7.3)? I am not aware of any IPR disclosures that would be warranted for draft-cheshire-sudn-ipv4only-dot-arpa. Stuart Cheshire -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call