On 3/13/20 6:43 AM, Barry Leiba wrote: > One choice is to entirely ignore 107 for the purposes of NomCom > eligibility. The last five meetings would then be 106, 105, 104, 103, > and 102, and one would have had to attend three of those to be > eligible this year. > > Another choice is to consider 107 to be a meeting that everyone has > attended, for the purpose of NomCom eligibility. There, the last five > would still be 107 to 103, but 107 would be an automatic “yes” for > anyone who volunteers for the NomCom. > I support counting 107 registered remote attendees toward NomCom eligibility, with no session attendance requirement (such as the Plenary). The requirement for session attendance is only meaningful if we expect people--who have attended two of the other meetings in the window--to game the eligibility system by registering with no intent to actually participate. I don't think that's a significant problem. -Jim
