Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Mar 13, 2020, at 7:43 AM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

One choice is to entirely ignore 107 for the purposes of NomCom
eligibility.  The last five meetings would then be 106, 105, 104, 103,
and 102, and one would have had to attend three of those to be
eligible this year.

+1 on ignore it. 

It looks to me that 107 is largely being canceled and people will not get the relationships, insights, and experience that we want for the nomcom. Treating everyone as being there is just not OK because it is unlikely they have the information we would hope someone on the nomcom would have. This applies equally to newcomers and people that have been to many IETF meetings. 

If we had an effective remote meeting, with all the types of conversations and meetings that happen at a normal IETF, I might feel differently. 







[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux