Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, IETF discussion list <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject
: Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
From
: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date
: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 16:10:50 +0000
In-reply-to
: <
CALaySJ+kFVXrVAkYLaO6MaPqDA29MzXhVFcxG0c6hZcBs-LqnQ@mail.gmail.com
>
References
: <
CALaySJ+kFVXrVAkYLaO6MaPqDA29MzXhVFcxG0c6hZcBs-LqnQ@mail.gmail.com
>
User-agent
: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.35.20030802
I am in favor of whichever result leads to a larger candidate pool.
References
:
NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
From:
Barry Leiba
Prev by Date:
Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
Next by Date:
Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for last-call discussions
Previous by thread:
Re: Forced virtual IETF 109 as well as 107
Next by thread:
Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Annoucements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Mhonarc]
[Fedora Users]
