Re: bill manning
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: Rodney Van Meter <rdv=40sfc.wide.ad.jp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject
: Re: bill manning
From
: Scott Brim <scott.brim@xxxxxxxxx>
Date
: Sun, 26 Jan 2020 03:14:35 -0500
Cc
: IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to
: <
D0604DF1-A0DF-4CA0-BA77-D594B76A18D9@sfc.wide.ad.jp
>
References
: <
m2imkyewsh.wl-randy@psg.com
> <
CAMzo+1b_mudFP3Bn+6i2pCNKfV4gkR7j1oWSF1XnkSqorC4j8A@mail.gmail.com
> <
D0604DF1-A0DF-4CA0-BA77-D594B76A18D9@sfc.wide.ad.jp
>
Wow. On Friday he seemed optimistic about getting his heart sooner than later. I'm surprised and I'm missing him.
References
:
bill manning
From:
Randy Bush
Re: bill manning
From:
Jorge Amodio
Re: bill manning
From:
Rodney Van Meter
Prev by Date:
Re: bill manning
Next by Date:
[Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dots-architecture-15
Previous by thread:
Re: bill manning
Next by thread:
Re: bill manning
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Annoucements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Mhonarc]
[Fedora Users]
