Hello,
At 10:08 AM 24-01-2020, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the
following document: - 'IETF Stream Documents Require IETF Rough Consensus'
<draft-halpern-gendispatch-consensusinformational-02.txt> as Best Current
Practice
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
last-call@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2020-02-21. Exceptionally, comments may
The usage of uppercase in Section 3 makes it look like the IETF only
understands an absolute prohibition when it is written in
uppercase. Is that really necessary?
The current boilerplace (RFC 7841) states has the following text: "It
represents the consensus of the IETF community". Is there a reason
why that that RFC if is not being update to match what Section 3 defines?
Which section of RFC 2026 will be updated?
An IETF participant is allowed to disagree with the IESG if he/she
believes that the IESG is taking a bad decision by approving the
publication of a document. There hasn't been any such case in recent
IETF history. I don't understand the rationale for having such a
significant change to address certain corner cases when there isn't
any factual information about such cases.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
