Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Not really. You’ve added an explanation of why it’s hard to encrypt.
> That is not needed IMO. What is needed is a statement that sending in
> the clear (not the default in IETF protocols these days) is OK because
> the data is not sensitive.
No, I'm saying that it's architecturally impossible to encrypt.
It's not a choice.
Anything you plan to put into the beacon has to take this into account.
I take your point about explaining why the contents are not sensitive though.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
