Re: [Last-Call] [dns-privacy] Review of draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis-03 - Section 3.5.1.1 Comments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 10, 2020, at 05:03, Sara Dickinson wrote:
> “As with many other protocols issues around centralisation also arise 
> with DNS. The picture is fluid with several competing factors 
> contributing which can also vary by geographic region. These include:
> * ISP outsourcing, including to third party and public resolvers
> * regional market domination by one or only a few ISPs “
> 
> An increased proportion of the global DNS resolution traffic being 
> served by only a few entities means that the privacy considerations for 
> end users are highly dependant on the privacy policies and practices of 
> those entities.”

This seems fine, but I'd have to see it in context, I think.

> I also previously proposed referencing 
> draft-arkko-iab-internet-consolidation that Stephane mentioned, but Ekr 
> objected. 

That's a poor choice for any citation at this stage.  We're a long way from having clearly articulated views on the topic, let alone having any sort of consensus.

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux