Re: [Last-Call] [dns-privacy] Review of draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis-03

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 8:28 PM Rob Sayre <sayrer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 8:15 PM Martin Thomson <mt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But it is true that HTTP has grown a number (many) of similar features.  You could - as this document strong implies - suggest that multitude of options makes it a risky proposition to use HTTP because of the surprising ways in which linkability manifests.  Or, you could recognize that you need a framework from within which to simplify the analysis. 

Huh, is there actually a privacy bug in the DoH spec wrt privacy here? 

Couldn't servers give out unique URI templates?

DoH doesn't specify how the clients get the templates. At least for a Firefox-style TRR program, what you describe can't happen because there is a single fixed template.

-Ekr


thanks,
Rob

_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
dns-privacy@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux