hi Sara, all, > On 18 Dec 2019, at 14:43, Sara Dickinson <sara@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> On 28 Nov 2019, at 20:33, Brian Trammell via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Reviewer: Brian Trammell >> Review result: Ready with Nits > > Brian, > > Thanks for the review! > >> >> This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's >> ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written >> primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's >> authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF >> discussion list for information. >> >> When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this >> review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC >> tsv-art@xxxxxxxx if you reply to or forward this review. >> >> This draft is ready for publication from a transport point of view. I have >> minor nits / suggestions: >> >> (1) References to QUIC imply that work is underway to build DNS over QUIC; >> while this has been suggested, there is to my knowledge no ongoing >> specification or implementation of such an application. There should be some >> additional text pointing out this context where QUIC is first mentioned. > > A specification for DNS-over-QUIC was actually started in April 2017 and is still active: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-huitema-quic-dnsoquic/ > but is, of course, somewhat held up because version 1.0 of QUIC will only support HTTP. I thought there was a reference to this but you are correct - it isn’t in there! I will add it in the introduction immediately after the referance to I-D.ietf-quic-transport. Great. > FYI - I am aware of work on a prototype implementation on and off since then and there was experimental work to implement it in a DNS benchmarking tool at the IETF 105 hackathon: https://github.com/DNS-OARC/flamethrower/tree/dns-over-quic > > >> >> (2) The references have some typos (e.g. [pitfalls-of-dns-encrption]) and are >> occasionally oddly named (e.g. [firefox] for a Mozilla announcement about DoH); >> suggest reviewing these. > > Suggest (if these references remain): > > [chrome] -> [chrome-doh-experiment] (article is titled “"Experimenting with same-provider DNS-over-HTTPS upgrade”) > [firefox] -> [mozilla-doh-as-default] (article is titled “What's next in making Encrypted DNS-over- HTTPS the Default” > [pitfalls-of-dns-encrption] -> [pitfalls-of-dns-encryption] These are all good, thanks! Cheers, Brian > The rest look OK (I think) or have the same names as in the original RFC.... > > Sara. > > > _______________________________________________ > Tsv-art mailing list > Tsv-art@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
