David, thanks for your review. Panos, thanks for your response. I entered a No Objection ballot. There will not be further Gen-ART reviews.
Alissa
Thanks David. Done. I replaced the RFC7525 references with BCP195. Should I upload or will there be more Gen-ART reviews?-----Original Message-----From: Ace <ace-bounces@xxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of David Schinazi via DatatrackerSent: Sunday, October 06, 2019 12:49 AMTo: gen-art@xxxxxxxxCc: draft-ietf-ace-coap-est.all@xxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx; ace@xxxxxxxxSubject: [Ace] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ace-coap-est-15Reviewer: David SchinaziReview result: Ready with NitsI am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.For more information, please see the FAQ at<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.Document: draft-ietf-ace-coap-est-??Reviewer: David SchinaziReview Date: 2019-10-05IETF LC End Date: 2019-10-18IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechatSummary: Document is clear and well-written.Major issues: None.Minor issues: None.Nits/editorial comments: I believe references to RFC7525 should instead refer to it as BCP195 to point to future revisions._______________________________________________Ace mailing listAce@xxxxxxxxhttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace_______________________________________________Gen-art mailing listGen-art@xxxxxxxxhttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
|
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call