Hello Erik
Thank you again for the review. We have accepted all your nits except those below (see EV>). They will appear in revision -22
Regards
-éric (the other one)
On 02/12/2019, 17:24, "Erik Kline via Datatracker" <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
- It's not clear if RFC 2119 text is needed for this document as it is now.
EV> it does IMHO as we have some cut&paste of text from RFC having those words.
- 2.1.5
- Could perhaps more explicitly state that DHCPv6 is not mandatory
to implement per IPv6 Node Requirements (RFC 8504).
EV> I would prefer not to mention it in the sake of brevity. DHCPv4 is also not mandated for IPv4.
- 2.4.2
- With the mention of NTP I suddenly thought: should there be
DNS-related text as well, or does that fall within this section too?
EV> as we mention protocols used by the routers, I would say that DNS is not really required & relied upon by routers (albeit often use), I would assume that DNS is simply included in the '...'
- 2.5.3
- The CYMRU link doesn't seem to go to a useful page anymore. :-/
EV> indeed, it looks like CYMRU has become a commercial company :-( unable to find the previous document :-( removed all links
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
