Mohit, thanks for your review. Authors, thanks for your responses. I entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Oct 31, 2019, at 4:08 AM, Mohit Sethi via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Mohit Sethi > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-10 > Reviewer: Mohit Sethi > Review Date: 2019-10-31 > IETF LC End Date: 2019-11-07 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: > This document uses a bit in the link state advertisement (LSA) sent from > routers to indicate that they are hosts which will not forward transit traffic. > The document is READY for publication. > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > I think the document would benefit from some more discussion on what happens if > a router that is repelling traffic is on the only path to some destinations? > How is this handled? Is it fair to say that H-bit is only a best effort way of > repelling traffic and does not guarantee that the transit traffic is actually > interrupted? > > Any reason that this is only done for OSPFv2 and not v3? Are there ways of > achieving this functionality (of repelling transit traffic) already in v3? > > Nits/editorial comments: > - Please expand acronyms like NSSA and LSAs on first usage. > - Abstract has stray " symbol. > - The list in the acknowledgements section could benefit from an Oxford comma: > Abhay Roy, David Ward, Burjiz Pithawala, and Michael Barnes for their comments. > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
