Hi Robert, thanks for the review. Responses below. > On 27 Nov 2019, at 9:47 am, Robert Sparks via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis-02 > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review Date: 2019-11-26 > IETF LC End Date: 2019-12-16 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: Ready for publication as a BCP but with nits to consider during the > approval process > > Nits: > > Neither the document nor the shepherds write-up acknowledge or explain the > replacement of RFC6838 with RFC3986 for a reference for specifying fragment > identifier syntax and semantics (hence dropping the reference to 6838). It > would be nice to have something captured in the record that supports/explains > this change. See my previous e-mail in this thread for the explanation. > Near that change, there is a typo, currently saying "fragment identiers' > syntax" (should be "identifiers'") Fixed in source. > It might be good to capture in the "Note to Readers" that the RFC Editor should > also remove Section 6.3 (URIs) since all the references to them will be removed > with the removal of this Note. Good catch; done. I've also updated the BCP115 reference to BCP35, as per <https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7320>. I note that tools.ietf.org doesn't appear to be updated to make the relationship between these clear. Cheers and thanks for the review, -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
