Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis-02

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks for the review Robert,

On Wed, Nov 27, 2019, at 09:47, Robert Sparks via Datatracker wrote:
> Neither the document nor the shepherds write-up acknowledge or explain the
> replacement of RFC6838 with RFC3986 for a reference for specifying fragment
> identifier syntax and semantics (hence dropping the reference to 6838). It
> would be nice to have something captured in the record that supports/explains
> this change.

I did notice this change in my review, but didn't consider it to be significant.  The shift in focus is within the bounds of what I consider editorial discretion as the effect is identical.

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux