Hi Scott,
Thanks for your review. Please see the response below.
Regards,
Ilango Ganga
Geneve Editor
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Bradner via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2019 12:16 PM
To: ops-dir@xxxxxxxx
Cc: last-call@xxxxxxxx; nvo3@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve.all@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-14
Reviewer: Scott Bradner
Review result: Ready
This is an OPS-DIR review of Geneve: Generic Network Virtualization Encapsulation This ID proposes a new control plane agnostic tunneling protocol primarily for network virtualization related applications.
While the document does not have a specific operational considerations section it is a very well written document that clearly explains the issues with and features of the proposal which includes most of the operations related considerations. I did not see any such issues that the document did not already deal with.
I do have one question – why, in section 4.3.1 (5) is this not a MUST
<Response> We have followed the same precedence as other UDP encapsulation protocols RFC 8086 and RFC 7510 in defining this requirement. </>
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
