Re: [Last-Call] [core] Last Call: <draft-ietf-core-senml-more-units-02.txt> (Additional Units for SenML) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Oct 31, 2019, at 1:17 AM, Hytonen Harri <harri.hytonen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Oct 30, 2019, at 17:21, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@xxxxxx>  wrote:
So let's get back to the fundamental issue. Why are we doing this? Some other SDO wants it is not really an answer. Understanding why the other SDO wants it would be a
good answer. Do the reasons cause more good than interoperability problems that come out of it. I tried to get info from a few other SDO about this but I failed. I’d like to
hear more about why we should do this. I’m not seeing big value in the saving the floating point calc on the device but perhaps there is a compelling use case where that
matters that I am not thinking of.

As explained before, it's not matter of saving floating point calculations, but preserving the original precision of the measurement. 

BR,
Harri Hytonen

I am not at all understanding this. Can you work me through an example ? I suspect that you might be giving senml more credit than it deserves. 





-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux